If you are writing an academic book, you are likely to want your institution’s library to be able to purchase it. You may also want to incorporate it into your online reading list so your students can read it.
Unfortunately, this isn’t as easy as it appears.
We still buy print, but we always buy ebooks first. This is to ensure our collections are accessible to as many people as possible, even when they’re not on campus and can also be a preferred format to our users with a particular accessibility need. However, publishers sell books to academic libraries very differently to how they sell them to individuals. Here are some of the challenges:
Sometimes even if an ebook is available for us to purchase it may be prohibitively expensive. For example, some titles are only made available through an etextbook model. This means the library is charged per student on a module. We are not purchasing the ebook outright, but subscribing to it for 1 year. If we need them for longer we pay again.
Ebooks can be incredibly expensive and are usually hundreds (and sometimes thousands) of pounds more expensive than a print title. This is understandable if access is available to all across the university, but often this can be for just 1 or 2 licenses. In the case of etextbooks the prices can be enormous.
The practical reasons why we are limited in what material we can make electronically available to staff and students are set out in 'Can my students read my books'.
Unfortunately, these are not the only limiting factors. As a library, we are committed to anti-racism and curating a collection that our staff and students can find themselves in. We are, however, limited not only by what publishers make available but also by what gets published in the first place.
There are additional problems that are related to the nature of the current publishing landscape. The scholarly publishing world is not reflective of society as a whole, with 81% of the workforce being white, going up to 91% for senior managers [Taylor et al 2020, p.358 ]. Royal Society data tells us that 36% of authors in their academic journals are from Black or global majority backgrounds, and that only 7% of authors are disabled [ Royal Society 2022, p.53]. This data tells us that the academic publishing world is one in which there is still a way to go before we can speak of a diverse and inclusive culture. And it is within this culture that what gets published is decided.
There are alternative forms of publishing that we encourage you to think about adding to your reading list. What we are inclined to think of as “rigorous” or “academic” publishing is often only the perspective of a particular person or group of people that we have learned to consider as standard. There could be immensely interesting work being done in your field that is published outside of the traditional means because it comes from people for whom it is more difficult to break into that field. Consider looking at blog posts, social media, YouTube videos, self-published works and other forms of media output – these may very well contain insight beneficial to your students.