Skip to Main Content

Searching for Systematic Reviews & Evidence Synthesis: Recording your search strategy and results

This guide brings together information and guidance on effective searching for journal articles and grey literature for those undertaking a systematic review, scoping review or other evidence synthesis


PRISMA (the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 
Updated in March 2021.
In February 2021 the PRISMA extension for searching was published. The new searching checklist includes 16 reporting items, each of which is detailed with exemplar reporting and rationale. It includes the guidance to "Include the search strategies for each database and information source, copied and pasted exactly as run"

Several extensions of the PRISMA Statement have been developed to facilitate the reporting of different types or aspects of systematic reviews. These include for Abstracts; Equity; Harms (for reviews including Harm outcomes); Individual Patient Data; Network Meta-Analyses; Protocols; Diagnostic Test Accuracy; and Scoping Reviews.

Reporting your search strategy

The PRISMA 2020 checklist states for '#7 Search strategy' that you should "Present the full search strategies for all databases, registers and websites, including any filters and limits used". The new 2021 PRISMA extension for searching extends this to "include the search strategies for each database and information source, copied and pasted exactly as run". These reported electronic search strategies normally appear in an appendix or as supplementary material to a published systematic review as they are too long to include in the main part of the systematic review. Some published systematic reviews only include a search strategy optimised for one database whilst others e.g. some Cochrane systematic reviews will publish the search strategies for all databases searched. It is not necessary to include the number of results for each search line (although this can be helpful if you are seeking feedback on the search strategy).

In many databases you can simply copy and paste the search strategy from the screen but you may also find that some databases allow you to download the search strategy (which may require less formatting than the copy and paste option). 

For a search strategy on the Ovid platform (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Global Health etc) take the following steps:

1) Run the search
2) Select 1 reference (it doesn't matter what this is as you are only interested in the strategy itself)
3)Click to Export

4) Select Word as the download format and ensure the Include Search History tick box is ticked. Click Export.

5) Open the Word document to view the search strategy at the top. This can be copied and pasted into e.g. an appendix or used to send to a colleague for peer review or posted to the King's KEATS KLaSS Searching for Systematic Reviews Discussion Forum for feedback [you may need to self-enrol at the main KEATS KLaSS module first before posting].

Exported Search strategy example

Ovid Search History Launcher

Ovid have now made available a way to run a search strategy that someone else has sent you e.g. from Medline, Embase, PsycInfo etc. The Search History Launcher is available on their website. You copy and paste the search history in (you will need to edit out search line numbers). It works on campus without having to enter a username or password.

This will be useful for:

  • sharing a search strategy with a colleague so that they can see your search, its results and adapt it. 
  • when using a published search filter to add to your own search e.g. to limit to UK research or only a specific publication type e.g. RCTs or qualitative studies.
  • when adapting a search strategy on a specific concept from another published systematic review.

Study Flow Diagram example

Examples of flow diagrams from published systematic reviews (see the PRISMA Flow Diagram for a template).

You will see the information recorded can differ even in Cochrane Reviews but the flow diagram can be a useful place to summarise what databases and other resources have been searched and the reasons why full text articles which were assessed have been excluded (as recommended by PRISMA).

Example 1:

From: Kew KM, Carr R, Donovan T, Gordon M. Asthma education for school staff. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD012255. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012255.pub2.

Example 2:

Flow diagram example

From: Welsh EJ, Carr R. Pulse oximeters to self monitor oxygen saturation levels as part of a personalised asthma action plan for people with asthma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD011584. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011584.pub2.

Publishing your search strategy

Best practice is to publish your systematic review search strategy alongside the systematic review. As well as including this in an appendix/supplementary information on a journal site it can also be submitted to a data repository.

  • The King's Research Data Management System is a a research data repository service providing long term storage and public access for datasets that support published research and/or have long term value. Search strategies fall into this category. View the Libraries & Collections Research Support webpage (Preserve > Deposit with King's tab) for more information on how to submit. Please note that this is normally limited to researcher and PhD level. 
  • Other data repositories are also linked from the Libraries & Collections Research Support webpage (Preserve > Deposit your data tab)